the origins of political order by francis fukuyama

The decision to focus upon these three institutions means that Origins is not a general history of politics or the state. The book is a thematic rather than a chronological history. The bulk of The Origins of Political Order consists of successive sections looking in turn at the origins of the modern state, of the rule of law, and of accountability.

Third is accountability, usually via elections but also via a sense of responsibility towards the people, a sense of ruling for the common good. Second is the rule of law, or binding constraints upon the rulers as well as the ruled. One is a modern state, with competent and honest officials, not prone to nepotism, corruption, and clientelism.

The book begins with the evolution of human nature, briefly covers social evolution from foraging to agriculture to the earliest states, and then compares political evolution, its parallels and divergences, in India, Islam, and particularly China and the West up to the eve of modernity.Ī key theme of Origins is that a modern political order is not a unitary package: it consists of a bundle of three separate institutions with distinct histories. Now The Origins of Political Order revisits these two issues, among others, to provide an overview of political evolution. The anticipated universal convergence currently seems unlikely. The continuing prevalence of autocracy, illiberal states, and ineffective governance in many parts of the world casts severe doubt upon it. This part of the argument remains undecided. Two decades on, and with no post-liberal, post-capitalist stage of history visible on the horizon, it appears that his basic diagnosis remains sound.īut the end-of-history thesis had also predicted that the rest of the world would follow the West and eventually arrive at the last stage. This is because liberal democracy is basically in alignment with human nature: it satisfies our natural desires for wealth and for recognition. There is no future regime beyond modern democracy and capitalism. What he did mean was that history as successive stages of society had reached its final level. Of course, he did not mean that history as a flow of events would cease. Two decades ago Francis Fukuyama gained widespread attention, and some notoriety, with the argument that the modern world had reached the end of history.

The origins of political order by francis fukuyama